![]() These tools have been designed this way for a reason. Probably their toolset can do it too, but they haven't go the extra mile of truly learning them. The documentation continues with this example where your buffer has the following contents: FooBarFoo FooBar Foo FooBarBaz Type F.Ironically now the fartest I move my hands from standard position is to press ESC, wich happens quite often in vim.Ī few times I've heard "wait, your terminal/editor can do what!?" when doing fancy things with public. supertab will provide an enhanced longest match support where typing one or more letters and hitting tab again while in a completion mode will complete the longest common match using the new text in the buffer. I just lay my hands on top of the keyboard and don't move them anymore. Now I rarely use arrows anymore, because ctrl-p/ctrl-n/ctrl-b/ctrl-f/etc. ![]() With that dual mapping you have to press ctrl to leave insert mode, let go of it and press it again to hit d. Consider this: Leave insert mode and scroll down a bit (which I do all the time). My laptop's arrows broke last year and I couldn't find the time to solve the issue (Amazon reach the space, but not the island where I live). The problem is you can't string commands together quite as fast. I had the same strule as a kid switching arrows for WASD, once you get used to it it's just another way, closer to where your hand already is.Īnd it's not just vim, you would not believe how convenient it is to go the extra mile and learn the terminal shortcuts for movement, copy-paste, history, etc. The idea with vim is to end up using composable actions as often as possible and arrows are not.īesides it doesn't make much of a difference anyway. Replaced internal function s:IsWordChar with vims keyword character class (Thanks to Ingo Karkat for the patch). I had already seen this plugin, but I simply didn't understand the plugin based on the readme file.Please note that arrow keys are not recorded while using "q" macros, and bring a lot of sheanigans when you are using some esoteric options because arrows interrupt them. I installed supertab and it does exactly what I want - completions are shown when appropriate, snippets are expanded if any, else a character is inserted. ![]() UPDATE The first question is not valid anymore. Since vim is derived from vi, it uses the same hjkl keys. What does your key do in vim (generally vs in insert mode)? Maybe I could learn something. I'm just wondering if maybe anyone knows of a way to integrate a third else ifblock in the original function to check for snippets. I also mapped shift-tab to expand triggers, but it's just not the same, and feels a bit clumsy every time. ![]() I am currently simply using to show my completions, which isn't all to bad. This makes Ultisnips take-over the previous mapping, no more Tab_Or_Complete() action. Next I wanted to get some snippet action going: let g:UltiSnipsExpandTrigger="" Before I used any snippets in vim, I found this function that inserts a tab or expands autocompletion according the context. My attempted solution: Firstly, I use UltiSnips for snippet pleasure. It inserts a tab (or spaces), it auto-completes the current word or it expands a snippet. My problem: Tab has many uses in most IDE's. I'm wondering how other vimmers handle the behavior of the key.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |